bob@xxxxxxxxxx (Bob Proulx) writes: > As far as the plethora of systems in use I believe that a consolidation > is occurring. In particular I see that Git is gaining a larger and > larger community of developers every day. People will always argue > endlessly that abc is better or worse than xyz. But in the end I don't > think there will actually be that many different systems in active > projects being used. I think Git is definitely in the running to be the > dominate version control system. It is a good choice for autoconf. Agreed. There are a few other interesting contenders out there with significant install bases that probably won't go away soon (Mercurial is being backed by Sun, for example, and bzr by Canonical), and I expect Subversion will persist for quite a while for more centralized models. But at the moment, Git is picking up the most momentum, and I think we'll find the world converging on either Git or Subversion depending on the level of conservatism desired. -- Russ Allbery (rra@xxxxxxxxxxxx) <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/> _______________________________________________ Autoconf mailing list Autoconf@xxxxxxx http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/autoconf
