Roman Rumisek wrote:
Exists easy way to build multi option libraries (for example: with/without
debug feature) into different library names (for example:
liba_d.so and liba.so)?
I can think of three things, the last one might be the most applicable.
1. I believe the libtool manual has some examples, where they show how
to include two rules - one for shared and one for static. I'm not sure
if this can be extended to what you want? See section 5.2 of libtool,
http://www.gnu.org/software/libtool/manual.html
2. If you need to have different configure options for each, it might be
worthwhile and easiest instead to use the VPATH build feature (if your
Makefiles support that) and a shell script to set the options. Then in
each subdirectory you'll have the built objects. The same goes for
building different architectures also.
3. Alternatively, the automake manual talks about building multiple
objects from the same source, see the example for "true" and "false".
Section 4.2 at
http://www.gnu.org/software/automake/manual/automake.html. This might be
what you need if you have debug activated from a #define, for example.
Cheers,
Jason.
_______________________________________________
Autoconf mailing list
Autoconf@xxxxxxx
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/autoconf
