Re: autoreconf vs autogen.sh

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Aug 24, 2007 at 08:33:21PM -0400, David Bruce wrote:
> I've inherited an autotools-using project and am trying to learn more about 
> autoconf and automake.  The project has used the following brief autogen.sh:
> 
> aclocal && autoheader && autoconf && automake --add-missing --copy
> 
> Is there any reason I can't just use autoreconf, which I understand is 
> supposed to fill this role?

Autoreconf will indeed replace this simple autogen.sh.


_______________________________________________
Autoconf mailing list
Autoconf@xxxxxxx
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/autoconf

[Index of Archives]     [GCC Help]     [Kernel Discussion]     [RPM Discussion]     [Red Hat Development]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux USB]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux