I don't understand. I don't see the duplication.
The duplication, at least i see it as duplication, is in the metadata. I
have lined up some of the information elements that go into autotools
and debian packageing.
libname
package name
executable name
dependencies
version
maintainer
Some of which are required or used in all three stages and others like
maintainer is only used in two(configure and debian/control). A example
like dependencies e.g. check for existence in configure, include in
makefile and list in debian/control.
This actually points to having a third file for shared meta data. Which
could have been used to substitute in to configure.in and makefile.am so
that they also contained less project specific information == easier to
maintain. But it is probably to much, i think. I want to stick to some
what more standard while it's probably not a good idea hence no one has
already made it ;D
My question is therefor is there such a system for configuration
management that can handle generation of the correct files or at least
substitution of them?
Are you trying to generate the ./debian/* files?
It would have been perfect to generate or at least substitute from
templates most of the debian/* files.
Thanks also to Baurzhan Ismagulov, for helpful tips in his mail!
--aslak
_______________________________________________
Autoconf mailing list
Autoconf@xxxxxxx
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/autoconf
