On Wed, 2007-06-27 at 08:16 +0200, Duft Markus wrote: > Hi Mark! > > It sure would be some benefit for the *user* of the package. Still as a > maintainer or developer, i really do need to manually configure, since i > *never ever* install any of the development packages in the default > prefix, this would be suicide! That is strange, I thought that installing packages under the default prefix of /usr/local was the normal way to install development packages. BTW, my solution for right now will be to use the 'dist-hook' target to add a stub Makefile to my projects' source tarballs. My stub makefile will be named Makefile.stub and the relevant lines in Makefile.am will be: dist-hook: cp Makefile.stub $(distdir)/Makefile I will post the stub Makefile to this mailing list when it is finished. Regards, Mark Heily _______________________________________________ Autoconf mailing list Autoconf@xxxxxxx http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/autoconf
