On 21-Jun-2007, Bob Friesenhahn wrote: | You are correct that a strict interpretation of GPL v2 does not allow | GPLed software to be installed using anything other than an an | open-sourced installation program which is itself licenced for | re-distribution under a no more restrictive license than GPL. Really? Even if the installer is not linked with the GPLed program that is installing? Why? I thought the GPL covered derivative works. How would an installer program be a derivative work of the program it installs? jwe _______________________________________________ Autoconf mailing list Autoconf@xxxxxxx http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/autoconf
