Re: AC_TYPE_UINT8_T and co

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, May 30, 2007 at 09:57:57AM -0700, Paul Eggert wrote:
> Stepan Kasal <kasal@xxxxxx> writes:
> > IMVHO the ac_cv_c_ prefix should be changed to ac_cv_type_ here.
> 
> The former expands to an actual type (e.g., 'unsigned char') whereas
> the latter expands to 'yes' or 'no'.  So they're not quite the same, no?

I completely missed that point.

> I suppose things could be handled more felicitously, but I don't see a
> bug in the current approach.

Then I agree with you that it's best to keep it as it is.

Sorry, Patrick, that my hasty proposal meant you wated some time
writing your latest patch.  Lets stay with
	#if defined(HAVE_INT64_T) || defined(int64_t)

Stepan


_______________________________________________
Autoconf mailing list
Autoconf@xxxxxxx
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/autoconf

[Index of Archives]     [GCC Help]     [Kernel Discussion]     [RPM Discussion]     [Red Hat Development]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux USB]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux