Re: AC_TYPE_UINT8_T and co

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Patrick Welche <prlw1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:

> Sorry for getting email trigger happy - I seem to still be confused... If
>   AC_TYPE_UINT8_T
> is run on a system without uint8_t, a typdef for uint8_t appears in config.h,
> but it is only created at the end of configure, so how would a subsequent
> test in configure see the typedef?

Shell code could look at a cache variable, I suppose.  But the bigger
question is: why would a later test care?


_______________________________________________
Autoconf mailing list
Autoconf@xxxxxxx
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/autoconf

[Index of Archives]     [GCC Help]     [Kernel Discussion]     [RPM Discussion]     [Red Hat Development]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux USB]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux