On Tue, May 29, 2007 at 01:31:04PM +0100, Patrick Welche wrote: > On Tue, May 29, 2007 at 04:54:52AM +0200, Stepan Kasal wrote: > > I'm going to answer only one of your minor comments now. > > Thank you for the explanation of CHECK_FOO vs CHECK_FOOS! The documentation > consistency change seems fine, and my configure.ac snippet becomes > > AC_INIT([autotype],[1.0]) > AC_CONFIG_HEADERS([config.h]) > AC_TYPE_UINT8_T > AC_TYPE_SIZE_T > AC_CHECK_TYPES([uint8_t, size_t]) > AC_OUTPUT Actually, that isn't quite right either, is it? Do I really need AC_CHECK_TYPES([uint8_t, size_t], [], [], [config.h]) as if a type didn't exist, and where typedef'd in config.h, how would AC_CHECK_TYPES know about it? Cheers, Patrick _______________________________________________ Autoconf mailing list Autoconf@xxxxxxx http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/autoconf
