Hello Harlan, * Harlan Stenn wrote on Wed, Apr 04, 2007 at 07:18:39AM CEST: > I've got a test in a configure script that runs like this: > > checking for MD5Init > gcc -o conftest -g -O2 -Wall -Wcast-qual -Wmissing-prototypes -Wpointer-arith -Wshadow -Wstrict-prototypes conftest.c -lmd5 -lelf >&5 [...] > /usr/bin/ld: warning: libssl.so.5, needed by /usr/lib/gcc/i386-redhat-linux/4.1.1/../../../libmd5.so, not found (try using -rpath or -rpath-link) So libmd5.so has a DT_NEEDED entry for libssl.so.5 but doesn't actually need any functions from libssl.so.5? Further, libssl.so.5 doesn't exist in the default search path for the runtime linker, but libmd5.so also doesn't have a DT_RPATH entry pointing to its directory? > and this test therefore succeeds, as gcc/ld is treating this like a > warning instead of an error. The target system is a Debian system, as I > understand it. If both libraries are from Debian packages, a bug report is in order. (The package containing libmd5 should depend on the package containing libssl; or the dependency should be removed.) Cheers, Ralf _______________________________________________ Autoconf mailing list Autoconf@xxxxxxx http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/autoconf
