On Mon, 2007-03-19 at 11:03 +0100, Stepan Kasal wrote: > Hello, > > On Mon, Mar 19, 2007 at 10:25:39AM +0100, Jules Colding wrote: > > If using _AM_SUBST_NOTMAKE isn't the "officially sanctioned" way of > > doing what I want to do, then what is the recommended way? > > sorry if my previous answer confused things. > > In short, I believe that using _AM_SUBST_NOTMAKE is the best > solution, currently. > > A bit longer answer: > though Autoconf 2.60 and newer now supports newlines in AC_SUBSTed > values, Automake does not yet support this feature. > So you can "offcially" use this feature only when using Autoconf > without Automake. If you need this feature in combination with > Automake, you have to use the _AM_SUBST_NOTMAKE workaround. OK, thanks, That clears things up. Thanks, jules _______________________________________________ Autoconf mailing list Autoconf@xxxxxxx http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/autoconf
