Harlan Stenn <stenn@xxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > Not using AC_C_CONST might not be an option for folks who need to deal > with older C compilers, but I can see that the number of folks who need > both older C compilers *and* C++ is probably a *very* small number. "Small" meaning less than 1, I suspect. It's been years since we got any bug reports about pre-C89 C compilers in real use, much less combining K&R with C++. Occasionally a computer museum speaks up and asks about K&R C. This is where people are deliberately maintaining an old machine just for fun. But I don't consider this a real use. People who want to run a computer museum shouldn't be using Autoconf anyway, as Autoconf itself goes back only to the early 1990s, and 'const' predates that. _______________________________________________ Autoconf mailing list Autoconf@xxxxxxx http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/autoconf
