Re: Usage of AS_FOR_TARGET

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

According to Paul Eggert on 12/8/2006 5:31 PM:
> Eric Blake <ebb9@xxxxxxx> writes:
> 
>> 2.13 to 2.59), but is it worth excluding AS_FOR_TARGET from the Autoscan 
>> reserved namespace since it is in heavy use in real-world configure scripts?
> 
> I assume AS_FOR_TARGET is some macro provided by the GCC developers?

Actually, it is a shell variable, similar to CC or AS, but designed to
allow cross-compilation.

> If so, I'm afraid I'd rather just let them live with m4_pattern_allow,
> as it's a useful reminder of the need to worry about AS_* macros.

It's unfortunate that the name of the cross-assembler environment variable
and the macro prefix chosen by autoscan interfere in this manner.  I don't
really have a strong opinion on whether the m4_pattern_allow should belong
to gcc or to autoconf, but either way, it is needed in order for gcc
compilation to work.

- --
Life is short - so eat dessert first!

Eric Blake             ebb9@xxxxxxx
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (Cygwin)
Comment: Public key at home.comcast.net/~ericblake/eblake.gpg
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFFehar84KuGfSFAYARAuh4AKCZObo4ppj4FQkPeiUySV72aKuY1gCcC3ts
SMCm6BtPFAMTgssNwGYLmY0=
=+Tyj
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


_______________________________________________
Autoconf mailing list
Autoconf@xxxxxxx
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/autoconf

[Index of Archives]     [GCC Help]     [Kernel Discussion]     [RPM Discussion]     [Red Hat Development]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux USB]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux