Hello, On Mon, Nov 27, 2006 at 08:26:20AM -0800, Bruce Korb wrote: > In this case, truth is, I don't think "wchar.h" requires "runetype.h", > but rather wint_t type *normally* requires "wchar.h" but, for OS/X, > it instead requires "runetype.h". well, I do not see the difference here: wint_t shall be defined in wchar.h. The message which started this thread indicates that if you include wchar.h alone, the compilation breaks. It seems that including runetype.h before wchar.h fixed that. So it seems that wchar.h reauires runetype.h. Stepan Kasal _______________________________________________ Autoconf mailing list Autoconf@xxxxxxx http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/autoconf
