On Mon, 13 Nov 2006, Paul Eggert wrote:
Howard Chu <hyc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
As I recall, they implemented a fairly old draft of POSIX threads (and
not the same draft version as DCE or AIX) and with a compiler named
"c89" it's a given that they're not up to C99 specs. But still
reasonably modern.
http://www.openldap.org/faq/data/cache/719.html
If they conform to C89 there should be no problem. In C89, returning
N from 'main' is like 'exit(N)'. This thread is about pre-C89 systems
where the return value from 'main' is mangled.
For example (reading the comments that you made earlier, perhaps you
should learn something old about C89):
In that case, it sounds like we should suggest to people that they use
the POSIX environment rather than try to port to a C-only environment.
But I am surprised that a C-only environment would mess up in this
way, even on mainframes.
VMS, where an application can return EXIT_SUCCESS or EXIT_FAILURE from
main - but (still complying with C89), those are not 0 and 1 respectively.
--
Thomas E. Dickey
http://invisible-island.net
ftp://invisible-island.net
_______________________________________________
Autoconf mailing list
Autoconf@xxxxxxx
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/autoconf
