Re: m4_for bug?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Eric Blake <ebb9@xxxxxxx> writes:

> Based on the documentation, I expected
> m4_for([i], [1], [5000], [[a]])
> to be identical to
> m4_for([i], [1], [5000], [], [[a]])
> with both forms printing 5000 a's.

That's not how I read the documentation; I read it as saying that you
need to provide an empty 'step' argument.  At this point I guess I'd
rather clarify the documentation than change the implementation.


_______________________________________________
Autoconf mailing list
Autoconf@xxxxxxx
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/autoconf

[Index of Archives]     [GCC Help]     [Kernel Discussion]     [RPM Discussion]     [Red Hat Development]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux USB]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux