Hello Guillaume, On Thu, Sep 28, 2006 at 03:44:30PM +0200, Guillaume Rousse wrote: > [...] aclocal is useful even when you don't use automake, for > importing your own macros as in my case, [...] I agree with you, ... > Anyway, my tests show that [aclocal] is called unconditionally. ... and autoreconf agrees with us, too. ;-) In this context, is seems a bit unfortunate that aclocal is distributed in the Automake package, but that's the way it is. The -I option of autoconf is where the _included_ files are searched for. For example, if your configure.ac contained m4_include([foobar.m4]) then the -I options specify where foobar.m4 might be found. (Though adding m4_include([ocaml.m4]) to the top of your configure.ac might be a usable workaround for your problem, I do not think it is ``the right way.'') autoheader and autoupdate have the same -I option as autoconf. The -I option of autoreconf is corresponding to this -I. aclocal's -I option is somewhat different: it specifies the search path for *.m4 files with individual macro definitions. This explains why we were reluctant to pass autoconf's -I options as the -I options to aclocal. But I understand it generates much confusion, so it seems we might reconsider the decision. Actually, if we passed the -I options from autoreconf to aclocal, would it break anything? If not, we might do it. (After all, the aclocal -I option is the only widely popular here. Almost noone uses autoconfs -I and -B options, the -I only pops up when someone confuses it with aclocal's -I.) Opinions from others are welcome. At the end, I would like to return to this: On Thu, Sep 28, 2006 at 03:09:39PM +0200, Guillaume Rousse wrote: > Eric Blake wrote: > > Sounds like you forgot to do > > ACLOCAL_AMFLAGS = -I ../autoconf > > > > in your Makefile.am. > I forgot to precise that I'm not using automake... Well, the above advice works even if you are not using automake: The presence of Makefile.am should not cause problems; autoreconf recognizes that you are not using automake because configure.ac does not call AM_INIT_AUTOMAKE. But autoreconf greps Makefile.am for that assignment, even in that case. I understand it looks ugly, and it might confuse people, though. Stepan Kasal _______________________________________________ Autoconf mailing list Autoconf@xxxxxxx http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/autoconf