Hello Paul, David, * Paul Eggert wrote on Tue, Aug 15, 2006 at 06:29:57PM CEST: > Thanks for reporting this; I didn't realize it was a regression. I still don't understand why this is a regression (the FreeBSD 5.4 I have access to has stdint.h). > -Wundef is a bit controversial, but it's easy for Autoconf to support > its use for programmers that prefer it, so I installed the following > patch. > +** Autoconf now uses constructs like "#ifdef HAVE_STDLIB_H" rather than > + "#if HAVE_STDLIB_H", so that it now works with "gcc -Wundef -Werror". > + Except now, HAVE_MALLOC, HAVE_REALLOC, and the results of AC_CHECK_DECLS (HAVE_DECL_*) are special cases. They seem to be documented correctly as such in the manual, but I think a mention of these in the NEWS item would be helpful, given that you intend to keep them that way. (And no, I don't know the reason for each of these special cases; at least the AC_CHECK_DECLS one looks like it's very much intended so.) Cheers, Ralf _______________________________________________ Autoconf mailing list Autoconf@xxxxxxx http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/autoconf
