Re: AH_VERBATIM missing 2nd arg (was: OS/2 and stdarg module)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> But I wonder a bit whether some code makes use of this
> "feature" that
>    AH_VERBATIM([key], [some code])
>    dnl ...
>    AH_VERBATIM([key], []) # no code
> 
> happens to not output the code.

The AH_VERBATIM doc makes it clear that different TEMPLATE arguments
to AH_VERBATIM should have different KEY arguments. It doesn't mention
the possibility to erase effects of earlier AH_VERBATIM calls.
Therefore I'd think this change is safe.

Bruno


_______________________________________________
Autoconf mailing list
Autoconf@xxxxxxx
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/autoconf

[Index of Archives]     [GCC Help]     [Kernel Discussion]     [RPM Discussion]     [Red Hat Development]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux USB]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux