Re: atomic replacement of autom4te's output file

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Paul Eggert <eggert@xxxxxxxxxxx> writes:

> I'd lean against this patch.  The standard behavior for Unix utilities
> <http://www.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/000095399/utilities/xcu_chap01.html#tag_01_07_01_04>
> is simply to open an output file for writing, and not to attempt to
> make the entire creation of the file atomic.

OK, thanks for the feedback.
-- 
"Then, I came to my senses, and slunk away, hoping no one overheard my
 thinking."
--Steve McAndrewSmith in the Monastery


_______________________________________________
Autoconf mailing list
Autoconf@xxxxxxx
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/autoconf

[Index of Archives]     [GCC Help]     [Kernel Discussion]     [RPM Discussion]     [Red Hat Development]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux USB]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux