Regarding this: (info Autoconf "Limitations of Usual Tools"):
| Portable `sed' regular expressions should use `\' only to escape
| characters in the string `$()*.0123456789[\^n{}'. For example,
| alternation, `\|', is common but Posix does not require its
| support, so it should be avoided in portable scripts. Solaris
| `sed' does not support alternation; e.g., `sed '/a\|b/d'' deletes
| only lines that contain the literal string `a|b'. Similarly, `\+'
| and `\?' should be avoided.
Does this mean that `]' in a sed regex should not be escaped if it is to
match a literal `]'?
Conversely to the second half of the paragraph, can we be certain that
sed 's|a\|b||'
does what I think it should do, namely remove a literal `a|b' from the
code, and not invoke alternation? Or should a different delimiter be
preferred for safety?
Cheers, and thanks,
Ralf
_______________________________________________
Autoconf mailing list
Autoconf@xxxxxxx
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/autoconf
