Re: expected Autoconf 2.59 <-> 2.60 compatibility?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Ben Pfaff <blp@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:

> Paul Eggert <eggert@xxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
>
>> Ben Pfaff <blp@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
>>
>>> Any comments on whether this is a good idea?
>>
>> It's a good idea, yes.  You could use 2.59c.  [...]
>
> I'll try to put out a Debian package of a 2.60 pre-release in the
> next few days, then.

I've done this now.  I actually generated it from the CVS tree,
for what it's worth.
-- 
"...I've forgotten where I was going with this,
 but you can bet it was scathing."
--DesiredUsername



_______________________________________________
Autoconf mailing list
Autoconf@xxxxxxx
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/autoconf

[Index of Archives]     [GCC Help]     [Kernel Discussion]     [RPM Discussion]     [Red Hat Development]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux USB]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux