-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 According to Ben Pfaff on 5/9/2006 8:49 PM: > > One option open to me is to package and upload a 2.59 pre-release > to Debian "unstable". I imagine that this would lead to more > widespread testing of the pre-release, which might work to catch > incompatibilities in advance of the final 2.60 release. 2.59c is intended to be such a pre-release; we are at a feature freeze, so that the only changes between 2.59c and 2.60 should be bug fixes. > > Any comments on whether this is a good idea? Yes, I would go for it. - -- Life is short - so eat dessert first! Eric Blake ebb9@xxxxxxx -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.1 (Cygwin) Comment: Public key at home.comcast.net/~ericblake/eblake.gpg Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFEYWwB84KuGfSFAYARAjJ7AJ43em0g9YFsAZWr4DZsBqwU4BAu7gCgv2H/ WjqEGJww4Fa2VjIOyY6n3Vs= =mJqI -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ Autoconf mailing list Autoconf@xxxxxxx http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/autoconf
