Paul Eggert <eggert@xxxxxxxxxxx> writes: >> pe> char *memechr(const char *str, const char *endp, char c); Come to think of it, this kind of signature isn't right for the mem* family, and I suppose it should be something like this instead: void *memechr(const void *mem, const void *endp, unsigned char c); This is because the mem* functions use void * as part of the API (so that you can pass anything to them), but internally they operate on arrays as if they were arrays of unsigned char. _______________________________________________ Autoconf mailing list Autoconf@xxxxxxx http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/autoconf
