Hello, I proposed: > > > Stepan> I would suffice if autoconf, when called in 3) updated ./configure. [plus] > > $(srcdir)/Makefile.in: $(srcdir)/Makefile.am $(top_srcdir)/configure On Thu, Apr 20, 2006 at 04:51:26PM +0200, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: > Also, you are munging time stamps behind `make's back. yes, this convinces me that Alexandre's patch is the right way to go. (FWIIW, I read his (second) patch, and I think it is good.) Have a nice day, Stepan BTW, you said: > This would silently break lots of `bootstrap' scripts that call > aclocal > automake > autoconf > > in that order, instead of the other way. (Remember that was the order > in which autoreconf-2.13 called them; [...] It wouldn't break them, I think, it would only slow them down. During the first `make', automake would update all Makefile.in's and the build would continue. But yes, it wouldn't be nice. _______________________________________________ Autoconf mailing list Autoconf@xxxxxxx http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/autoconf
