> Well, in modern (Autoconf 2.50+) times, > AC_OUTPUT([files ..]) > > is just equivalent to > AC_CONFIG_FILES([files ..]) > AC_OUTPUT This helps a lot. Thank you! > Well, yes, somewhere you do need to get the necessary differentiation. > If you rather want to do it by a configure argument, like > --enable-special-code Ok, I can see this happening now. > or a more appropriate naming, you can do that as well. The manual > explains how to use AC_ARG_ENABLE; be sure to also read > info Autoconf "Configuration Actions" > > on how to invoke AC_CONFIG_FILES in the presence of optional arguments. > This may seem less dirty to you, and it will allow for optional output > files at configure time. I like this a lot better. > Well, to me you did not specify enough details of your problem, so that > was one guess. You clarified a lot for me. Thank you. _______________________________________________ Autoconf mailing list Autoconf@xxxxxxx http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/autoconf
