Re: testing of CVS Autoconf

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Mar 15, 2006 at 06:06:30AM +0100, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu
> 	with Pathscale compiler has two failures:
> 	110: GNU Fortran 77
> 	111: GNU Fortran
> 	because the compiler tricks configure into thinking it's the GNU
> 	compiler, but actually has a different flag for free-form.
> 	Probably safest to fix the test rather than the macro?

The testsuite.log fragment would be instructive, but that sounds right.

Thank you for this extensive test work.


_______________________________________________
Autoconf mailing list
Autoconf@xxxxxxx
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/autoconf

[Index of Archives]     [GCC Help]     [Kernel Discussion]     [RPM Discussion]     [Red Hat Development]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux USB]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux