On 2/21/06, Keith MARSHALL <keith.marshall@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Given the complete absence of related of bug reports, either: > > 1) This isn't true (which seems unlikely), or (more likely) > > 2) No one has attempted to build groff >= 1.19.2, or to use pdfroff, > on any system where /bin/sh is linked to zsh. > > Can anyone either confirm or refute the hypothesis that there may be > a zsh related contention in pdfroff? I haven't used zsh as my default shell in a fair while, but I can confirm that I did have autoconf hanging under zsh with pre 1.19.1 CVS snapshots under Cygwin (using Cygwin's pty emulation, btw). _______________________________________________ Autoconf mailing list Autoconf@xxxxxxx http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/autoconf
