Re: Checking for GCC 4

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Yes, it is better to check for specific features/problems than to check
for a version number.

Sometimes it's Really Hard to check for features/problems.  Really
Really Hard.

Sometimes it is way more efficient to test for a version number than a
specific feature/problem.

I don't have any problem with that.

If the version test is discovered to be insufficient, to resolve that
insufficiency the test must be improved.

There are times I still do OS-version checks to >make assumptions<
about, for example, file system layout or startup script methods.

Is this inelegant?  Yes.  Have I received any bug reports about it?  No.

Software isn't finished until the last user is dead.

Evolution happens.

Some "issues" are more significant than others.

H


_______________________________________________
Autoconf mailing list
Autoconf@xxxxxxx
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/autoconf

[Index of Archives]     [GCC Help]     [Kernel Discussion]     [RPM Discussion]     [Red Hat Development]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux USB]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux