Hello, On Wed, Jan 04, 2006 at 10:49:16AM -0600, Bob Friesenhahn wrote: > It must be nice to have such a simple project. :-) > > For my own project, released autoconf and automake have been fine, but > released libtool has never been quite good enough. So for many years, > I have used hand-tweaked versions of CVS libtool. I can't expect the > other developers to reproduce the libtool I am using. [...] I suspect that the rule "where is a will there is a way" applies here. If I were in your situation, I'd probably check in only the files brought by libtoolize, the rest of bootstrap would remain. But yes, you are right: till now, I was lucky enough to avoid any fiddling with libtool. :-) Have a nice day, Stepan _______________________________________________ Autoconf mailing list Autoconf@xxxxxxx http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/autoconf
