Re: AC_CONFIG_HEADERS vs. AC_CONFIG_FILES

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, 2005-12-20 at 03:31 +0000, Harlan Stenn wrote:
> My POLA is that config.status produces the Makefiles, config.h, and
> maybe other things.

True, but ...

* config.status's primary task is acting as cache for files it _wants_
to generate.

* config.h's (autoheaders) only can change when running configure.
I.e. technically there is no need to generate them from inside of
config.status.

> Having a file that is only produced when configure is run is
> counter-intuitive.
I beg to differ, IMO, it's just being stylish ;)

Ralf




_______________________________________________
Autoconf mailing list
Autoconf@xxxxxxx
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/autoconf

[Index of Archives]     [GCC Help]     [Kernel Discussion]     [RPM Discussion]     [Red Hat Development]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux USB]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux