On Thu, 2005-12-15 at 06:26 -0800, BRM wrote: > --- Braden McDaniel <braden@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Wed, 2005-12-14 at 08:31 -0800, BRM wrote: > > > I originally sent this to the Automake list since > I > > > figured it was an issue with Automake, however, I > have > > > not seen any response to it yet. So, any help is > very > > > greatly appreciated. > > You're trying to do work that autoconf wants to do > > for you. > > Your build directories are > > configuration-specific--which can include > > platform-specific aspects. To configure for a > > platform (or even a > > particular configuration of a platform): create a > > directory, change to > > it, and run your configure script there. > > Normally, that may be true. It is always true. That is how autoconf works. > However, the project I am > working on will need different directories for > different platforms and possibly (not positive yet) > different cpu´s because of vast differences in code. > Parts of the project will be providing GUI interfaces, > and at present it is planned to use WIN32 API´s on > Windows, while using something else on Linux/Unix as I > haven´t gotten a library like Qt approved yet (and I > don´t know if I´ll be able to). Is there a better way > still, to solve this problem? I´m all ears. That's fine. It doesn't mean you need to generate makefiles conditionally. Generate the same set of makefiles all the time; let configure take care of exactly what they contain (and thus what gets built). -- Braden McDaniel e-mail: <braden@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <http://endoframe.com> Jabber: <braden@xxxxxxxxxx> _______________________________________________ Autoconf mailing list Autoconf@xxxxxxx http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/autoconf