Allan Clark wrote, quoting me: >> But "Reply-to-All" is *not* the most appropriate solution -- it's what >> I used here, so *you* can have *two* copies of this message. > > great. I've got two eyes. These duplicates are statistical noise in > the world of spam... And I'm sure they are extremely popular with users on dial up connections who are paying for connection time by the minute ;-) > I don't see the problem. ...and I still have choice to "reply" or > "reply-all". Great. You still have that choice, even if the "Reply-to" header points back to the list: . Reply to the address in the "Reply-to" header, for a list reply; . Reply to the address in the "From" header, for a private response; . Reply-to-All, to spam the world... Regards, Keith. _______________________________________________ Autoconf mailing list Autoconf@xxxxxxx http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/autoconf
