Hi Lars, * Lars J. Aas wrote on Fri, Sep 16, 2005 at 04:48:36PM CEST: > > I'm wondering if there is a convention already for this or not. > I am linking static libraries on windows (msvc++). Not involving > libtool or anything ready-made from autoconf/automake for that matter. > Anyways, I can either just ball together just the object files for > the library, or I can link the archive and pull in external > dependencies at the same time. Doing the latter, I don't need to > do it when I link the static library into the executable. Not to hijack your question, but: how do you do this? If the semantics of doing this are compatible with Libtool library dependencies, we could make use of this in our upcoming MSVC support.. :) > So what I'm looking for is an option name for letting the > configurer specify when to use delayed linking of other static > libraries, and to be able to do it on a library-for-library basis. > > Anybody set up options for anything like this before, and if so, > how did you name them (and access the info inside the configure script > in case there's already a system for it)? Can't help you much there, sorry. Cheers, Ralf _______________________________________________ Autoconf mailing list Autoconf@xxxxxxx http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/autoconf