On Wed, 2005-08-03 at 20:13 +0200, Stepan Kasal wrote: > On Wed, Aug 03, 2005 at 02:06:03PM -0400, Trevor Woerner wrote: > > How old is Automake-1.9? > > One year plus one week. You'd think people could keep up with releases at that rate, but my experience is people who aren't running Debian complain a lot if I tell them they have to upgrade their autotools. I don't have a lot of sympathy, but I want them to use my code, so what can I do? :-) > > Couldn't we just make it a requirement (as in the attached patch)? > > I guess it'll be easier than maintaining workarounds. We still need the m4_ifdef "workaround" in Automake 1.9, so that's not an issue. Since Automake 1.7 works fine as long as check is installed, and I recommend having check installed anyway, I don't see any point in requiring a later version. --Jamey _______________________________________________ Autoconf mailing list Autoconf@xxxxxxx http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/autoconf
