Hello, On Mon, Jul 04, 2005 at 11:52:38AM -0700, Paul Eggert wrote: > > rm -f -r conftest* confdefs* conf$[$]* $ac_clean_files > > How about if you simply remove conf[0-9]* instead? Those file names > are all reserved by Autoconf anyway. And it's more consistent to > always remove all of them, instead of removing some hard-to-explain > subset. yes, this sounds good. But when we got that far, is there any reason why Autoconf tests should use conf$$*? Isn't conf2.obj or conftest2.obj cleaner? (I know, with conftest2.* one has to carefully think about 8.3 systems.) Stepan _______________________________________________ Autoconf mailing list Autoconf@xxxxxxx http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/autoconf
