Re: autoconf and STL

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Bob Friesenhahn wrote:

It seems to me that the vast majority of C++ compilers currently in use provide a working version of the STL library.

As maintainer of MySQL++ (which relies heavily on STL), I agree. GCC has taken over the POSIX world in recent years, and the remaining compilers have gotten much better. The only compilers I'm still getting problem reports about are third-tier things like the MinGW GCC port, and the freebie Borland compilers.

Months ago, I removed support in the library for USL CC -- the C++ compiler shipped with old UnixWare and Solaris systems -- and haven't heard a single peep of complaint.


_______________________________________________
Autoconf mailing list
Autoconf@xxxxxxx
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/autoconf

[Index of Archives]     [GCC Help]     [Kernel Discussion]     [RPM Discussion]     [Red Hat Development]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux USB]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux