Is AC_ARG_WITH([cflags-warning], dnl ... ) a proper usage of `AC_ARG_WITH'? Or it violates autoconf conventions, and some other ways of specifying these configuration options (perhaps, `var=value' in command line) are more appropriate? Know at least one package doing so. Specifying parts of cflags to be eventually combined may be really useful. Depending on build / host systems or configuration options, some user specified values may be overridden, or perhaps some flags added to them. And all that done surely on warning or optimization flags, with the results being combined into `@CFLAGS@' substitution only eventually. On one hand, there is no such `cflags-warning' software package that may be installed or not installed on a system. On the other hand, useful values of these options obviously depend on compiler, that is obviously external software wrt package being configured. Moreover, the set of possible options may theoretically depend on some compiler add-ons being installed (however, never have heard of such add-ons to any compiler to date). _______________________________________________ Autoconf mailing list Autoconf@xxxxxxx http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/autoconf
