Stepan Kasal wrote: > > well, this behaviour is documented in the Automake manual, > in node ``Extending'': > > : Note that Automake does not make any difference between rules with > : commands and rules that only specify dependencies. So it is not > : possible to append new dependencies to an `automake'-defined target > : without redefining the entire rule. > I understood that the Makefile.in files generated by Automake don't care about configured libraries for computing $(myexe_DEPENDENCIES). If I manually define this variable using $(myexe_LDADD), then I have problems with removing all the -L and -l arguments. And if I try to use additional dependency lines listing the configured libraries instead, then I loose the build rule for myexe. Is this correct? It would be nice if we could find some improvement here. Maybe an $(EXTRA_myexe_DEPENDENCIES), to be defined in Makefile.am? Regards Harri _______________________________________________ Autoconf mailing list Autoconf@xxxxxxx http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/autoconf
