Hugh Sasse Staff Elec Eng <hgs@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > But we have already agreed that we would be testing for features, > not version numbers, Then I'm afraid I still don't understand your proposal. Autoconf already tests for features. Perhaps you can flesh it out a bit more by saying exactly what should go into the DEPENDENCIES file for Autoconf itself, and what "configure" should do in some common cases. To be honest, I still don't really understand what you're proposing. _______________________________________________ Autoconf mailing list Autoconf@xxxxxxx http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/autoconf
