On Tue, 22 Feb 2005, Bob Friesenhahn wrote:
On Tue, 22 Feb 2005, Hugh Sasse Staff Elec Eng wrote:
Yes, so library 5 is a dependency of library 14.
That's what I'm trying to express (in my later post).
However, it is not a *known* (to the configure script developer) dependency.
The failure is due to an indirect dependency.
In which case we are no worse off than we are now, but where things
are known, we are better off.
Bob
_______________________________________________
Autoconf mailing list
Autoconf@xxxxxxx
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/autoconf
