Re: portable way to trap SIGCHLD?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Eric Blake <ebb9@xxxxxxx> writes:

> Are there any systems where there are no accessible versions of kill(1)
> which can convert either a single signal name to number, or vice versa?

That ability wasn't in 7th Edition Unix.  It's fairly universal now,
but I dunno about some of the older systems like Ultrix.  Also, many
older System V Unixes called it SIGCLD instead of SIGCHLD, so there
will be some variance in the name (as opposed to the number).  And
some Unix clones and/or variants don't have the signal at all.


_______________________________________________
Autoconf mailing list
Autoconf@xxxxxxx
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/autoconf

[Index of Archives]     [GCC Help]     [Kernel Discussion]     [RPM Discussion]     [Red Hat Development]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux USB]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux