On Thu, 2005-01-20 at 16:42 -0800, Paul Eggert wrote: > Stepan Kasal <kasal@xxxxxx> writes: > > > 1) Is `test -d' portable enough? The manual doesn't say the contrary. > > Yes, it's been around for ages. How about portability of "test -d" being applied to "special files" (char/block device files, pipes/sockets, soft/hard links to directories/files etc.)? Ralf _______________________________________________ Autoconf mailing list Autoconf@xxxxxxx http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/autoconf
