Re: AC_PROG_CC_C99

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Roger Leigh wrote:

I'd rather avoid this complexity.  Isn't it easy enough to abort based
on the value of ac_cv_prog_cc_c89 (or whatever)?


Yes, but I didn't know if users were allowed access to those
internals.  I've reverted this (but kept it for internal use).

From a plain-old-user's point of view, I'd much rather see Roger's original version. I don't want to rely on undocumented autoconf internals any more than I have to. As soon as you release a version of autoconf with this macro set included and people start relying on these internal variables, you've just committed to never changing them in the future.



_______________________________________________ Autoconf mailing list Autoconf@xxxxxxx http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/autoconf

[Index of Archives]     [GCC Help]     [Kernel Discussion]     [RPM Discussion]     [Red Hat Development]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux USB]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux