Hi, On Wed, Dec 01, 2004 at 10:15:12AM -0400, Leonardo Boiko wrote: > Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote: > >Maybe one of the automake targets do a full cleanup, I never tried to track > >that down. I never needed it. > > Doesn't "make distclean" do that? But I too never needed it... no. "make distclean" should give you the same tree as when the tarball was unpacked. "make maintainer-clean" deletes a bit more than distclean, but it still leaves "Makefile.in", "./configure", etc. Even after maintainer clean, you don't need to run more than ./configure && make to build the package. I think autotools shouldn't even try to support the ``full cleanup''. What if the ./autogen.sh (or ./bootstrap) has imported ``config.guess'', gnulib modules, or whatever? Automake, autopoint, autoheader could remove the files they generate, but I doubt its worth the trouble. Exporting a fresh tree seems much safer. Regards, Stepan Kasal _______________________________________________ Autoconf mailing list Autoconf@xxxxxxx http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/autoconf
