On Tue, 26 Oct 2004, Thomas Dickey wrote: (sorry about the previous - missed keystroke) > > Not bad, but still not perfect: mktemp is not a POSIX standardized > > utility, and $RANDOM is bash specific. So what do you propose on POSIX > > systems without mktemp and bash? Just fall back on the unsecure foo$$ > > pattern? Or ship an mktemp.c with the package, to be compiled by > > 'configure' very early? As long as your readers continue to have no interest in POSIX or portability to anything except Linux and kindred, you have no problem. HAND -- Thomas E. Dickey http://invisible-island.net ftp://invisible-island.net _______________________________________________ Autoconf mailing list Autoconf@xxxxxxx http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/autoconf
