Toby White <tow21@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
> I've managed to generate two shortish (~1000 line) configure scripts
> demonstrating the difference in behaviour. The only difference
> between the two (apart from version numbers in comments) is the
> changed LINENO code.
Is the LINENO code being triggered for you? That is, are the scripts
creating a file configure.lineno and executing that file? If so,
can you capture these two configure.lineno files and post them?
config.works uses ${SHELL-/bin/sh} to run configure.lineno, whereas
config.broke uses $CONFIG_SHELL. Do these evaluate to different
shells? If so, that might explain the problem. Perhaps CONFIG_SHELL
is buggy.
> http://www.esc.cam.ac.uk/~twhi03/config.broke
> http://www.esc.cam.ac.uk/~twhi03/config.works
I assume that you inserted the "echo here..." lines after running
"autoconf". Did you insert any other lines?
_______________________________________________
Autoconf mailing list
Autoconf@xxxxxxx
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/autoconf
