Re: /usr/local [was: CPPFLAGS prob]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Russell Shaw wrote:
One caveat, though: the manpage says
PKG_CONFIG_PATH
A colon-separated (on Windows, semicolon-separated) list of directories to search for .pc files. The default directory will always be searched after searching the path;
the default is lib-dir/pkgconfig where libdir is the libdir where pkg-config was installed.

What happens if you don't have the library in question installed
in PKG_CONFIG_PATH? pkg-config will silently search /usr/lib/pkgconfig,
and possibly grab the wrong version of the library.
If you're unlucky, the library will link, but the resulting program won't run.
One more little reason, perhaps, to have a separate copy of pkg-config
per installed userland.

configure.ac checks the library via pkg-config, so regardless of what
library gets detected, if the autoconf check accepts the library version,
the resulting build should work. ...
If autoconf doesn't complain, the result should work. It is up to the
user to make sure the right <package>.pc file is accessed by pkg-config.

All I'm suggesting is that, when putting together a set of compilers and userspace libraries for users, it will make their lives easier if a copy of pkg-config is included with the compilers, so they don't have to specify PKG_CONFIG_PATH. Or, if you think it's better for your users to stop whining and figure everything out for themselves, you can just let them use the system pkg-config, even though it might silently find the wrong package.

- Dan

--
My technical stuff: http://kegel.com
My politics: see http://www.misleader.org for examples of why I'm for regime change


_______________________________________________ Autoconf mailing list Autoconf@xxxxxxx http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/autoconf

[Index of Archives]     [GCC Help]     [Kernel Discussion]     [RPM Discussion]     [Red Hat Development]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux USB]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux