On Sun, Jan 18, 2004 at 12:03:22AM +1000, Kevin Ryde wrote: > Thomas Dickey <dickey@xxxxxxx> writes: > > > > perhaps. But there's no AC_REQUIRE connecting any of the pieces. > > If there were an AC_REQUIRE, the expected behavior would be to > > force AC_PROG_LIBTOOL to expand before the macro. Since there is > > none, it should expand within. > > If we're talking about libtool 1.5, then notice the first thing > AC_PROG_LIBTOOL does is an AC_REQUIRE of _AC_PROG_LIBTOOL. :-( So the fac that AC_PROG_LIBTOOL AC_REQUIRE's something is the fault (i.e. a bug in AC_REQUIRE)? -- albert chin (china@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx)
