Re: generating a configure script in a subdirectory?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, 17 Dec 2003, Akim Demaille wrote:

>
>  > But beware, autoreconf can be dangerous and doesn't always work.
>
> Why?

In times past, it has trashed & thrashed subdirectories.  For example,
I recall (a couple of years ago) that libltdl required a particular
version of Autoconf.  Libltdl was subordinate to my package's
directory.  Executing autoreconf ended up with a zero-length configure
script in the libltdl subdirectory.

It seems that autoreconf behaves better in current releases, but as we
know, older autoconf's are difficult to get rid of so it is likely
that troubled autoreconf's are still in active use.

Bob
======================================
Bob Friesenhahn
bfriesen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.simplesystems.org/users/bfriesen




[Index of Archives]     [GCC Help]     [Kernel Discussion]     [RPM Discussion]     [Red Hat Development]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux USB]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux